Safe Harbour (2018) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

75%

Safe Harbour2018

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Safe Harbour leans into modern ideological territory with its handling of refugee issues and morality. While not the most over-the-top example, its focus on social commentary and fairly predictable moral alignment lands it firmly in woke territory, though still allowing an occasional nod to complexity.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

The series somewhat prioritizes identity and social themes over pure character-driven narrative, using the refugee crisis as its lens. Some viewers might feel that certain characters exist more as symbols of broader issues than as fully realized individuals. Still, it offers good character complexity in places.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

Safe Harbour questions traditional responses to immigration and puts typical Australian cultural assumptions under the microscope. It often challenges or reinterprets themes of responsibility, family, and loyalty, which may come across as undermining foundational values for some viewers.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Alternative perspectives, especially those critical of refugee policies, are usually presented through less sympathetic or one-dimensional characters. There’s little pluralism or robust debate, most of the narrative aligns with a progressive stance on identity and migration.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.