Satisfaction (2007) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

83%

Satisfaction2007

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

"Satisfaction" is unambiguously on the woker end of the spectrum, embracing edgy social topics and progressive ideology in both narrative and character focus. Those looking for non-woke storytelling should expect a heavy dose of modern social themes.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

"Satisfaction" centers primarily around sex workers and leans heavily into exploring identity and sexuality, often foregrounding these traits over traditional character development. It appears many storylines prioritize social themes rather than individual arcs or merit, potentially sidelining narrative depth for topical focus.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The series clearly reinterprets family, morality, and religion through a decidedly modern and progressive lens, frequently challenging or subverting traditional views on these subjects. Masculinity’s traditional traits are minimized, with the focus shifted towards female empowerment and liberated sexual identities.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

More traditionalist perspectives are rarely shown sincerely, with conservative views generally absent or reduced to opposing forces. Dialogue and storylines reinforce a largely uniform progressive worldview, leaving little room for true internal debate or pluralism.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

10%

35%

Movie poster for Darwin's Brave New World

30%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.