Scandal (2012) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

83%

Scandal2012

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Scandal is a prime-time example of early-2010s “woke” TV where identity, progressive values, and modern ideology drive the story. High on representation, low on traditional diversity of thought or roles; it’s a slick, entertaining but unmistakably woke ride.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

Scandal often puts identity, particularly race and gender, at the narrative forefront, with Olivia Pope portrayed as hyper-competent and morally ambiguous. Some viewers may find her character teeters on the edge of flawless, and casting choices focus heavily on diversity. While the plot remains engaging, it sometimes feels as though narrative is secondary to social messaging.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The show frequently subverts traditional gender roles and portrays some aspects of religion, family, and monogamy as obsolete or obstacles. Masculinity, especially in authority figures, is regularly problematized or weakened, while modern moral perspectives are elevated. Traditional values rarely get a fair shake.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Scandal's depiction of dissenting views is not exactly subtle. Opposing perspectives are often caricatured or presented through obviously villainous characters, making the ideological playing field pretty one-sided. There’s little room for alternative or traditional worldviews, which can feel a bit preachy.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.