Shots Fired (2017) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

87%

Shots Fired2017

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

"Shots Fired" is a highly woke procedural, using a race-flipped premise to drive home modern social commentary. The show prioritizes ideology over organic drama, frequently critiques cultural foundations, and limits ideological diversity within its narrative.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

In our view, "Shots Fired" places significant focus on identity politics and racial dynamics, sometimes at the expense of more nuanced character development. The message often overshadows natural storytelling, with character motivations and arcs occasionally feeling secondary to the broader social commentary.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The series flips traditional narratives on race and policing, frequently critiquing longstanding institutions and social norms. Masculinity and authority figures are often presented through a skeptical, reform-minded lens, and traditional perspectives are left mostly unexamined, which could be read as undermining cultural foundations.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Alternative or more traditional perspectives on race, policing, and justice are rarely given space beyond surface-level representation or as strawmen. Most dissenting views are framed unfavorably or as obstacles to progress, contributing to a sense of ideological uniformity throughout the show.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.