Son Pari (2000) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Son Pari2000

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Son Pari is refreshingly non-woke, with storytelling rooted in timeless fantasy and traditional Indian values. There’s no forced representation, cultural revisionism, or ideological lecturing, just wholesome, family-friendly entertainment.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Son Pari largely focuses on whimsical, fantastical storytelling rooted in classic good-versus-evil dynamics. The characters are cast and developed based on traditional story roles, not contemporary identity politics or forced diversity. Its narrative integrity is essentially uncompromised by modern woke trends.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The show upholds traditional Indian values, emphasizing family, friendship, and morality without undermining cultural or religious foundations. Gender roles remain conventional, and there is little to no subversion or revision of established cultural touchstones. This is about as non-woke as it gets.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Son Pari doesn’t preach a modern ideological monoculture. While it doesn’t present a wide variety of perspectives, traditional values are the norm and not mocked or villainized. There is a clear absence of contemporary activism or politicization of alternative worldviews.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Golmaal – Fun Unlimited

10%

15%

Movie poster for Jab Pyaar Kisise Hota Hai

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.