Steptoe and Son (1962) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Steptoe and Son1962

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Steptoe and Son is about as non-woke as TV gets. Its humor and drama are based on genuine character and cultural context, not modern ideological concerns. In short: classic, unfiltered, and refreshingly free of 2020s-style moralizing.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Steptoe and Son keeps its focus on character-driven humor, not ideology. The main characters are well-established based on personality and circumstance rather than any identity markers. Forced representation and flawless diverse characters are notably absent, with storytelling taking priority.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The series is rooted in working-class British family life, with traditional father-son dynamics front and center. Masculinity, family struggle, and old-school morality are treated as everyday realities, not punchlines or outdated relics. There’s little evidence of cultural revisionism or gender role subversion here.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

While main themes reflect traditional values, there’s the expected 1960s lack of overt diversity. However, alternative perspectives aren’t mocked; the humor comes from generational and class clashes. There's no agenda to villainize dissent, just good old-fashioned British banter.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

12%

The Worker

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.