Still 17 (2018) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Still 172018

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

A rare oasis in the modern media desert, 'Still 17' offers a wholesome story free from heavy-handed woke messaging. It focuses on real characters, relatable struggles, and traditional values. If you're weary of the usual ideological preachiness, this is a safe bet.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

In our view, 'Still 17' places narrative and character development over identity politics. Characters are fleshed out based on personality and circumstance rather than checking representation boxes. There is no forced diversity or emphasis on woke themes, leading to a refreshingly focused romantic drama.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The show upholds traditional values, emphasizing family, personal responsibility, and healing. Masculinity and femininity are portrayed in nuanced, respectful ways. Religion and cultural norms are not subverted or mocked, sticking closely to Korean societal expectations and respecting cultural heritage.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

'Still 17' avoids heavy-handed ideological narratives, allowing room for diverse worldview expressions among its characters. No one is villainized for holding traditional perspectives, nor is there a push for ideological uniformity. It’s simply a heartfelt drama, not a soapbox.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for My Girlfriend Is a Gumiho

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.