Stitchers (2015) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

58%

Stitchers2015

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Stitchers sits in the 'mildly woke' category. Its casting and tone nod toward modern trends, but it doesn’t hammer viewers over the head with ideology. If you prefer shows with minimal identity politics, it’s more tolerable than most recent fare.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

Stitchers features a female lead and a fairly diverse cast. While some could argue casting is slightly influenced by modern expectations around representation, the show mainly focuses on plot and character development over heavy-handed identity politics. A few progressive notes, but nothing so glaring as to dominate the narrative.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

The show doesn't strongly undermine traditional values, but it also doesn't celebrate them. Family and faith are basically background noise, with science and government agencies driving most plots. Some moments lean into questioning authority or traditional structures, but overall it's middle of the road.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Woke

What is this?

While most characters tend to agree on social issues and there is a lack of real ideological diversity, alternative perspectives aren't overtly mocked or demonized. The show stays in fairly safe territory, but rarely explores genuine debate around core societal questions.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

20%

The House at the Edge of the Galaxy

30%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.