Tales of the Gold Monkey (1982) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Tales of the Gold Monkey1982

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

A relic from a less politically charged time, "Tales of the Gold Monkey" is blessedly low on woke content and high on retro escapism. If anything, its worldview now feels downright non-woke and refreshingly unapologetic.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

"Tales of the Gold Monkey" was created before the modern era of forced representation. Characters are cast and developed based mostly on era-appropriate archetypes, with minimal emphasis on identity politics. Any diversity present feels organic, not shoehorned.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The show leans into classic adventure tropes that tend to affirm, not subvert, traditional family roles, masculinity, and heroism. Religion and culture are treated in the pulpy style typical of the early 1980s, without much ideological revisionism.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Alternative perspectives occasionally appear, but the show generally avoids overt ideological messaging. It delivers escapism, rather than social commentary. Traditional worldviews are standard, with little evidence of monocultural messaging or demonization of dissenting views.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for In the Heat of the Night

Movie poster for All the President's Men

12%

Hometown

Movie poster for The Legend of Lizzie Borden

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.