The Adventures of Puss in Boots (2015) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

The Adventures of Puss in Boots2015

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

The Adventures of Puss in Boots sticks to classic adventure and comedy, steering clear of the usual woke pitfalls. It keeps its focus on entertainment rather than heavy-handed messages, making it a refreshingly non-woke choice for family viewing.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

This animated series is primarily focused on fun storytelling and adventure, with Puss as the charismatic lead. Diverse characters appear, but their inclusion feels organic and not shoehorned in to check boxes. The character arcs and humor come first, not identity politics.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

There’s no agenda to mock or subvert traditional ideas about family, morality, or masculinity. In fact, bravery and cleverness, classic traits, are celebrated. The show’s light-hearted tone keeps it safely anchored in the realm of classic adventure.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There’s no obvious attempt to push a particular worldview or to villainize more traditional perspectives. The show remains playful, inclusive, and, thankfully, not preachy.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for The Penguins of Madagascar: Operation DVD Premiere

Movie poster for The Penguins of Madagascar - Operation: Get Ducky

85%

Movie poster for The Spooky Tale of Captain Underpants: Hack-a-ween

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.