The Ashley Madison Affair (2023) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

79%

The Ashley Madison Affair2023

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

The Ashley Madison Affair leans strongly into modern critiques of tradition, marriage, and masculinity. There's little room for traditional perspectives to get a fair shake, and the narrative is shaped by a decidedly one-sided worldview. If you’re looking for non-woke storytelling, steer clear.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

While the series primarily focuses on the sensationalism of the Ashley Madison scandal, it leans into identity politics by spotlighting issues like gender roles and empowerment within the context of infidelity. Some narrative moments appear more focused on examining social narratives than on exploring the core facts of the scandal.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The show repeatedly frames traditional marriage, masculinity, and faithfulness as either outdated or unrealistic, often highlighting the struggles of women in supposed patriarchal structures. It rarely paints traditional values in a positive light.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

There's a noticeable lack of genuine exploration of viewpoints supporting traditional values or the institution of marriage. Dissenters to the show’s prevailing attitudes are largely presented as either hypocritical or clueless, limiting the range of perspectives.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for The Murders Before the Marathon

15%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.