The Baby-Sitters Club (2020) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

92%

The Baby-Sitters Club2020

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

The Baby-Sitters Club (2020) takes classic stories and filters them heavily through a modern, hyper-woke lens, prioritizing progressive messaging over narrative and character depth. Traditional values get the cold shoulder here.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The Baby-Sitters Club consistently foregrounds identity factors, race, gender, sexuality, over more traditional story or character development. Several plot points revolve around characters' diversity, sometimes giving the impression that personal growth and classic childhood adventures take a backseat to ideological messaging.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Traditional family structures, masculinity, and religion are sidelined or reinterpreted for modern sensibilities. Parents are often portrayed as clueless or problematic, while the young protagonists are cast as ethically and emotionally infallible, upending classic family dynamics and moral hierarchies.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Alternative viewpoints to the prevailing progressive message are essentially nonexistent. Characters who adhere to more traditional or dissenting views are either absent or play the role of antagonists or obstacles, rarely given authentic nuance.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Blazing Team: Masters of Yo Kwon Do

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.