The Book of Daniel (2006) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

80%

The Book of Daniel2006

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

"The Book of Daniel" embraces a significant amount of early-2000s "wokeness," routinely challenging tradition, favoring progressive social themes, and leaving little space for more traditional viewpoints. While tame by today's standards, for its time it was quite overt in its agenda.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

The show pushes identity themes into the main narrative, featuring plotlines centered around sexuality, addiction, and challenging traditional roles within a church setting. While not as overbearing as more recent fare, it sometimes shoehorns modern issues over authentic character development, diluting narrative integrity.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

"The Book of Daniel" frequently questions and critiques traditional religious values, portraying issues like same-sex relationships, addiction, and church hypocrisy. This can be seen as undermining core cultural and religious frameworks, portraying them as flawed or ripe for radical change.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Woke

What is this?

Alternative or traditional viewpoints often appear as sources of conflict or are reduced to caricatures. Dissent from the show's progressive stances typically comes from unsympathetic or unnuanced characters, suggesting limited room for worldview diversity.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Someone I Used to Know

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.