The Forest of Love: Deep Cut (2020) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

13%

The Forest of Love: Deep Cut2020

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Bleak, disturbing, and gleefully non-woke. ‘The Forest of Love: Deep Cut’ cares way more about shock and psychological torment than pushing modern ideological agendas.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The show largely avoids sacrificing narrative integrity for trendy ideology. Characters are defined more by their disturbing complexity than by identity checkboxes. There's no obvious forced representation or emphasis on box-ticking diversity; it's a twisted psychological character study at its core.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Traditional values aren't specifically mocked; rather, the show delves into crime, manipulation, and depravity. While it certainly subverts mainstream morality, it doesn't target religion, family, or masculinity for cheap shots. It's more about the dark side of humanity than a takedown of cultural pillars.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Few ideological messages are pushed. If anything, the series is nihilistic, focusing on manipulation and human darkness. No modern moral monoculture here, characters are flawed across the board, and it certainly doesn’t present a woke consensus or villainize the non-woke.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Baby Assassins Everyday!

Movie poster for Some Love Begins with Mistaken Identity

Movie poster for KOWLOON GENERIC ROMANCE

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.