The Glass Dome (2025) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

95%

The Glass Dome2025

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

The Glass Dome pulls out all the stops when it comes to injecting modern ideology over storytelling. With forced representation, mockery of tradition, and a total lack of viewpoint diversity, this show could be used as a wake-up call for anyone skeptical about Hollywood's current direction.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The show heavily spotlights identity markers over character depth, consistently foregrounding race, gender, and sexuality in ways that feel shoehorned. Several characters are introduced mainly to fulfill diversity checkboxes, often at the expense of narrative coherence or natural world-building.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Traditional institutions like family and religion are depicted as outdated or oppressive, while masculinity is mostly either lampooned or pathologized. The story frequently flips classical gender roles and injects modern ideology into historical and cultural contexts without much subtlety.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Almost every character embraces the same set of progressive values, and dissenters are reduced to unnuanced caricatures or direct antagonists. There's virtually no space given to alternate or traditional perspectives, resulting in a thoroughly one-dimensional worldview.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Trolltider – legenden om Bergatrollet

92%

90%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.