The Glass Virgin (1995) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

The Glass Virgin1995

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

As far as current standards go, The Glass Virgin is refreshingly non-woke, a throwback to when stories were about characters and setting, not modern talking points. It respects tradition and focuses on narrative, earning it one of the lowest woke scores you’ll find these days.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

This 1995 period drama sticks closely to conventional storytelling, focusing on character growth, personal hardship, and romance rather than shoehorning in modern ideological points. Characters are developed through their experiences and background, not identity checklists. Forced representation is practically non-existent here.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The Glass Virgin largely respects historical setting and traditional values. Core family, class, and faith themes are depicted without the ironic treatment or undermining typical in recent fare. There’s no attempt to rewrite history for modern sensibilities. Masculinity, femininity, and duty are depicted in line with their time.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There’s no noticeable ideological conformity or caricatured treatement of dissenting views. Worldviews are more reflective of 19th-century Britain than 2020s Twitter. Alternative perspectives are treated with nuance rather than quickly villainized or dismissed.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.