The King's Affection (2021) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

85%

The King's Affection2021

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

A thoroughly modern spin on a period drama, "The King’s Affection" serves up historical revisionism and forced gender-role subversion, with little room for alternative views. Definitely a high-scoring woke showcase by today’s standards.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The show centers on a female lead disguised as a male crown prince, a classic example of forced gender role reversal. The storytelling prioritizes this gender-bending dynamic over traditional character arcs or historical plausibility, putting identity ahead of realism and merit. Some might say this undermines narrative integrity.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Traditional gender roles are thoroughly subverted, with masculinity sidelined and the female lead portrayed as near-flawless, competent, and perpetually sympathetic. The premise itself reinterprets Korean royal history through a modern ideological lens, making heritage feel negotiable for messaging's sake.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The show offers little room for traditional perspectives, mostly framing rigid gender or cultural expectations as backward. Characters who challenge the protagonist's role are villainized or used as caricatures in service of the message. There’s little real debate or ideological variety.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

12%

Movie poster for Angel's Last Mission: Love

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.