The Lady's Companion (2025) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

88%

The Lady's Companion2025

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

The Lady’s Companion enthusiastically checks nearly every woke checkbox, compromising narrative for messaging, subverting traditional values, and swaddling its world in a very modern, uniform ideology. It’s a masterclass in contemporary TV’s love affair with “progress.”

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The show spotlights diverse identity markers in its main characters, placing these at the forefront rather than developing deeper personalities or organic storylines. At times, plot developments feel like they exist primarily to highlight social justice talking points, which can make the narrative seem forced and formulaic.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Traditional family and religious values are largely sidelined, often portrayed as obstacles or outdated relics. Masculinity gets a gentle ribbing, while female and queer characters are consistently shown as more enlightened and progressive, subverting classic roles with little nuance or historical realism.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Nearly every character preaches from the same ideological hymnbook, with dissenters painted as out-of-touch, or simply as punchline fodder. There’s a noticeable lack of sincere debate or pluralism within the show’s worldview.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

70%

12%

91%

83%

25%

88%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.