The Osbournes Want to Believe (2020) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

The Osbournes Want to Believe2020

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

In our view, 'The Osbournes Want to Believe' is refreshingly non-woke. The series is more concerned with ghosts and family jabs than pushing any agenda. Hollywood could use a few more like this.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The show is an unscripted reality series where the Osbourne family watches and reacts to paranormal footage. There's no evidence of forced representation or ideological plotting. It focuses on family banter and genuine reactions rather than manufactured diversity or agenda-laden storytelling.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Family dynamics, quirky as they are, are at the heart of the show. While irreverent and full of signature Osbourne sarcasm, there’s no real effort to mock or undermine tradition, religion, or masculinity. Mostly it’s just Ozzy, Sharon, and Jack being themselves.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

The show is apolitical, with no overt ideological messaging. The humor is based on personal quirks and supernatural skepticism rather than promoting or villainizing worldviews. There’s little to no virtue signaling or monocultural moralizing here.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for The Hunt for the Zodiac Killer

92%

Movie poster for Wicked Tuna: Outer Banks Showdown

75%

33%

Movie poster for Hotel Transylvania: Transformania

15%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.