The Politician's Husband (2013) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

52%

The Politician's Husband2013

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

A cut above today's usual woke deluge, 'The Politician's Husband' still indulges in a bit of gender role revisionism and lacks much ideological diversity. It's more nuanced than most, but unlikely to win non-woke viewers over completely.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

While 'The Politician's Husband' deals with gender dynamics in marriage and politics, it generally stays grounded in character-driven drama. Some viewers may interpret certain character shifts (e.g., the wife's rapid competency rise) as a touch topical, but overall it's far less forced than more modern fare.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

The show explores shifting gender roles, questioning traditional family dynamics and masculinity in the context of marriage and ambition. It isn't aggressively subversive, but it does poke at old-fashioned values in a way that's more reflective than hostile.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Woke

What is this?

Alternative perspectives are not exactly robustly represented, the series leans into a progressive narrative about gender power struggles. Dissenting voices are more obstacles than well-fleshed-out counterpoints, giving a whiff of monoculture without barreling into caricature territory.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

25%

69%

Movie poster for True History of the Kelly Gang

90%

Confessions of a Diary Secretary

65%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.