The Reluctant Landlord (2018) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

15%

The Reluctant Landlord2018

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

"The Reluctant Landlord" is refreshingly non-woke by today’s standards. It’s an old-fashioned, low-stakes sitcom, prioritizing comedy over virtue-signaling and ideology.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Mildly Woke

What is this?

"The Reluctant Landlord" prioritizes traditional sitcom character development over overt identity politics. While the main character is of South Asian descent, his background generally serves the comedy rather than coming across as forced. Storylines focus on relatable, everyday issues without compromising coherence for ideology.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The show portrays family, community, and small-town life with a generally lighthearted touch. There’s no major subversion or critique of religion, masculinity, or traditional values, just everyday quirks. It leans toward classic British sitcom territory, minus soapboxing.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Alternative viewpoints aren’t the focus, but the series doesn’t mock or demonize traditional perspectives either. The humor is inclusive without targeting any particular worldview. Ideological homogeneity simply isn’t a centerpiece here.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

18%

Movie poster for Keeping Up with the Joneses

Brilliantman!

Movie poster for The Story of Lovers Rock

Dream School

Chancers: The Great Gangster Film Fraud

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.