The Romanoffs (2018) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

71%

The Romanoffs2018

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

The Romanoffs walks a line between sharp, character-driven drama and occasional modern ideological nods. While it delivers more nuanced storytelling than most recent fare, some woke elements pop up in its approach to history and identity. It’s not a total ideological monoculture, but it leans modern more than traditional.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

While the show occasionally prioritizes identity-driven subplots, most stories remain focused on personal drama and flawed human characters. Representation is present but generally woven into the narrative rather than shoehorned. However, some episodes seem to emphasize modern identity politics at the slight expense of organic storytelling.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

The series indulges in a bit of cultural revisionism, exploring European aristocratic identity through a modern lens, and sometimes poking fun at traditional family structures or religious themes. Still, it tends to prioritize interpersonal drama over outright undermining cultural touchstones.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Woke

What is this?

There’s a tendency for the show to flirt with contemporary ideological interpretations, and alternative viewpoints are sometimes handled with a hint of caricature or skepticism. Pluralism exists, but the ideological spectrum overall leans predictably modern.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.