The Rose of Versailles (1979) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

20%

The Rose of Versailles1979

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Despite a central character defying gender norms, 'The Rose of Versailles' remains rooted in historical drama and classic storytelling. It puts modern productions to shame by focusing on character depth and philosophical conflicts rather than any heavy-handed ideological messaging.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

While the show centers on Oscar, a woman raised as a man and serving as a palace guard, her characterization is nuanced and historically grounded for its era. Most characters are motivated by classic themes of duty, love, and loyalty, rather than modern identity politics.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Mildly Woke

What is this?

Some may view the show's depiction of gender as progressive, but traditional values like honor, family duty, and loyalty are strongly present. Masculinity and femininity are both explored, but not outright subverted or ridiculed.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Mildly Woke

What is this?

The narrative allows for competing worldviews, aristocrats, revolutionaries, and the conflicted Oscar herself. Alternatives are treated with complexity, not as mere caricatures, which is refreshing compared to today's norm.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Lupin the Third: The Castle of Cagliostro

Movie poster for Golgo 13: The Professional

Movie poster for Lupin the Third: The Mystery of Mamo

10%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.