The Secret of the Sahara (1988) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

The Secret of the Sahara1988

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

'The Secret of the Sahara' is a refreshing throwback to non-woke storytelling: focused on adventure, character, and narrative authenticity without shoehorned ideology. It stands as a sturdy example of pre-woke Western media.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Set in the early 20th century, 'The Secret of the Sahara' focuses on adventure, exploration, and classic heroism. There’s minimal emphasis on identity politics, and characters are driven more by story than ideology. Casting reflects the historical era and setting without obvious forced diversity.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The series generally respects traditional values like bravery, family, and cultural legacy. Masculine heroes and religious elements are presented in accordance with the genre and period, without subversion or mockery to appease a modern agenda.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There’s little evidence of pushing a uniform modern ideology. Moral debates and character conflicts are grounded in the narrative world, not in contemporary sociopolitical talking points, and alternative viewpoints are treated seriously.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

10%

Movie poster for The Young Indiana Jones Chronicles

Movie poster for The Adventures of Don Coyote and Sancho Panda

Movie poster for Professor Poopsnagle's Steam Zeppelin

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.