The Sixties (2014) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

75%

The Sixties2014

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

While visually engaging and generally well-produced, 'The Sixties' frames much of its narrative through a strongly modern, progressive lens. Viewers looking for a balanced, non-woke portrayal of the era may find its approach one-sided and lacking in ideological diversity.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

The series often focuses heavily on civil rights, protests, and changing social values, sometimes at the expense of portraying the full spectrum of 1960s America. There’s a clear emphasis on certain identity-driven events, and tradition-bound perspectives are given less attention.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

Traditional family values and religious roots are frequently depicted as either outdated or complicit in the decade’s problems. Masculinity and authority figures are often cast in a negative light, while counterculture and progressive movements are elevated.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Alternative or traditional perspectives are often caricatured as regressive or oppressive, with little space given for genuine debate or nuance. The prevailing worldview leans heavily into modern progressive assumptions.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Neil Young: Heart of Gold

Movie poster for Magnificent Desolation: Walking on the Moon

10%

Movie poster for Lady Valor: The Kristin Beck Story

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.