The Storm (2009) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

10%

The Storm2009

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

The Storm keeps its focus on disaster and intrigue, rarely veering into modern ideological territory. Traditional values and narrative integrity remain intact, refreshingly non-woke by today’s standards.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The Storm (2009) focuses heavily on its disaster/conspiracy storyline and sticks to conventional character archetypes. Diverse casting is limited and identity rarely trumps plot or character motivation, so there’s little sense that ideology outweighs narrative focus.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

There’s no strong push against traditional values, family, or religion. The show doesn’t subvert masculinity for ideological reasons or rewrite history to serve a modern agenda. It’s mostly rooted in standard disaster television tropes.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

While the villains could be interpreted as stereotypical authority figures, alternative worldviews are present, and there’s little evidence of singling out traditional perspectives for mockery or villainization. Pluralism survives, if just barely.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Bianca - Wege zum Glück

Movie poster for Rosamunde Pilcher's Shades of Love

Movie poster for Angels with Dirty Wings

Movie poster for Rosamunde Pilcher: Herzen im Wind

Unforgiven

Für immer verloren

Der Runner

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.