The Taste (2013) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

The Taste2013

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

The Taste is refreshingly focused on cooking rather than box-ticking or lecturing. It sticks to food, competition, and talent, with almost no 'woke' distractions for those who just want a solid culinary showdown.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The Taste is a cooking competition show focused on skill, technique, and flavor. There's minimal emphasis on identity narratives or overt political messaging. Judges and contestants are evaluated for their cooking, not for ideological box-checking. Any representation choices appear organic to the food world, not forced.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

There is no noticeable undermining or subversion of tradition, family, religion, or masculinity in the show. The program is about food and competition. Traditional values surrounding craft, discipline, and respect for culinary heritage are evident rather than challenged.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

No ideological consensus is pushed; the diversity present is standard for modern shows but not weaponized. Contestants argue over food, not politics, and traditional perspectives are present and unmocked. Viewers seeking ideological sermons will be left hungry.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Exposed

The Jacksons: A Family Dynasty

30%

Outback Hunters

Movie poster for Chef Wanted with Anne Burrell

Movie poster for Spartan: Ultimate Team Challenge

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.