Tiger: Spy In The Jungle (2008) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Tiger: Spy In The Jungle2008

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

A refreshing non-woke entry, 'Tiger: Spy In The Jungle' is gloriously free of ideological trappings. If all you want from TV is stunning footage of nature without a side of social commentary, this is as classic as it gets.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

As a nature documentary focused on tigers in the wild, the show is dedicated to animal behavior and ecology. There is no noticeable effort to foreground ideology, nor are human social issues or identity narratives shoehorned in. The story revolves entirely around the tigers and their environment.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

There is no portrayal or subversion of human cultural values, family, religion, or gender roles. The only 'family' values depicted are those of tiger cubs and mothers. The natural world, rather than human societies, is centre stage throughout.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

The series does not depict any human ideological conflicts or perspectives, let alone promote or villainize any. It stays strictly in the observational lane of wildlife filmmaking.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Egyptian Journeys with Dan Cruickshank

Movie poster for No Maps for These Territories

Movie poster for Cave of Forgotten Dreams

Movie poster for The House That £100k Built

Movie poster for A People Without A Land

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.