Treason (2022) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

69%

Treason2022

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Treason doesn’t break records for wokeness, but it rides the current wave – identity is foregrounded, and traditional norms take a back seat, even if the thriller framework keeps things recognizable. It’s not the wokest out there, but classic-minded viewers will spot the trends.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

Treason’s casting and character arcs include several modern identity-based choices. While the spy-thriller plot mostly sticks to genre standards, some may feel characters’ identities are foregrounded more than their skills or arc, hinting at forced representation without derailing the show outright.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

There’s a noticeable subversion of traditional gender and family roles, with the lead female characters shown as especially strong, competent, and assertive, while traditional masculinity seems a bit subdued. Classic family dynamics are present but tend to play second fiddle to international intrigue.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Woke

What is this?

Dissenting or traditional views rarely get fair airtime. Alternative worldviews tend to pop up mostly through villainous or unlikable characters, so there’s a definite slant, though it’s not as heavy-handed as in some recent series.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for The Sky Trembles and the Earth Is Afraid and the Two Eyes Are Not Brothers

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.