Twilight of the Gods (2024) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

91%

Twilight of the Gods2024

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Twilight of the Gods is a textbook case of a classic narrative being reassembled to fit modern ideological expectations, with tradition sacrificed at every turn. Its narrative and visual choices prioritize messaging over myth, ensuring a thoroughly woke experience.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The show features a conspicuous emphasis on casting and character design choices that appear driven largely by modern identity politics. Character arcs often take a backseat to virtue cues and representation, resulting in narratives that at times feel secondary to messaging.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Traditional mythologies and roles, especially those rooted in classic Norse stories, get heavily updated. Masculine characters are frequently weakened or sidelined, while the show goes out of its way to place modern values above ancient ones, undermining the original intent of these myths.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Alternative or traditional viewpoints are not just rare, they’re presented as regressive or villainous when they appear at all. There’s little to no room for sincere debate or pluralism; a unified, ideologically modern worldview dominates the narrative.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Chip 'n' Dale: Park Life

Twelve Forever

Movie poster for Mickey and the Roadster Racers

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.