V (2009) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

23%

V2009

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

"V" (2009) is refreshingly non-woke by today’s standards. Narrative remains king, traditional values aren’t knocked down for sport, and there’s room for actual debate. Not perfect, but a breath of fresh air compared to modern Hollywood fare.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Mildly Woke

What is this?

"V" (2009) generally keeps its focus on suspense and sci-fi drama, rather than modern identity politics. Character arcs and conflicts are driven by the alien invasion plot, not overt social agendas. While there is a diverse cast, identity traits do not override story coherence or individual character development.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Mildly Woke

What is this?

The show leans into themes of resistance, family, and faith, rather than subverting them for modern ideological messaging. While there are some moments that question authority or organized religion, they mostly serve the plot and don’t feel like targeted commentary against tradition or masculinity.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Mildly Woke

What is this?

Alternative views exist, with both heroes and villains representing a range of perspectives. The show's conflict is about survival and morality under pressure, not about pushing a single worldview or demonizing more traditional stances.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

61%

Movie poster for Molly: An American Girl on the Home Front

12%

30%

Movie poster for My Guide to Becoming a Rock Star

67%

13%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.