War & Peace (1972) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

War & Peace1972

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

BBC’s 1972 "War & Peace" is about as non-woke as they come. Faithful to its source, it prizes narrative and character over ideology, with virtually no signs of modern political interference. A breath of fresh, pre-woke air.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

This adaptation sticks closely to Tolstoy’s novel, emphasizing deep character development over identity politics. Casting and portrayals reflect historical norms rather than modern diversity mandates, giving the narrative room to breathe without forced messaging.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Religion, family, and tradition are depicted with respect and gravity, very much in line with the original text and the era portrayed. There’s no obvious attempt at revising cultural or historical values to fit any contemporary ideology.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Alternative viewpoints aren’t villainized; rather, characters from various backgrounds and ideals are humanized. There’s genuine debate, internal conflict, and a range of perspectives presented, reflecting a pluralistic storytelling approach.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for A Ghost Story for Christmas

Movie poster for A Warning to the Curious

The Seagull

Movie poster for Dance of the Seven Veils

Movie poster for The Price of Coal, Part 2: Back to Reality

The Philanthropist

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.