Warehouse 13 (2009) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictMildly Woke

30%

Warehouse 132009

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Warehouse 13 isn't a woke warning sign: identity takes a back seat to story, the jabs at tradition are lighthearted, and there's enough ideological variety to let different viewpoints breathe. By today's standards, it's refreshingly non-woke, if a little tongue-in-cheek.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Mildly Woke

What is this?

Warehouse 13 generally keeps its plots focused on adventure and artifact retrieval rather than constant lectures on identity. While diverse characters appear, they're fleshed out and mostly chosen for story utility, not just box-checking. For the most part, narrative isn't tossed aside for ideology, a breath of fresh air by modern standards.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Mildly Woke

What is this?

Traditional values like teamwork and loyalty are given their due, and while some playful jabs at gender roles exist, it's never aggressively subversive. Masculinity isn't demonized, nor are core social institutions mocked. It’s cheeky but never pure culture-warfare territory.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Mildly Woke

What is this?

The show typically steers clear of heavy-handed monoculture. While there's the odd villain with more 'traditional' views, they're far from one-dimensional caricatures, and some ideological pluralism can be observed. Overall, it's fairly open-minded, even quirky, rather than rigidly conformist.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.