Who Killed Jill Dando? (2023) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Who Killed Jill Dando?2023

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

'Who Killed Jill Dando?' is refreshingly non-woke by today's standards, remaining focused on the crime and investigation rather than shoehorning in identity politics or moral sermons. It keeps the spotlight on the case, which is a rare virtue in modern media.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

As a true crime documentary, the series primarily sticks to the facts of the Jill Dando case, avoiding heavy-handed ideological insertions. Identity themes or forced representation do not play a significant role, so the narrative integrity remains largely intact.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The show does not delve into religious, family, or traditional cultural topics. Its focus is strictly on the crime, investigation, and societal reactions, avoiding any revisionism or subversive messaging regarding cultural foundations.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There's no overt mocking or caricaturizing of alternate viewpoints; nor is there a chorus of ideological groupthink. The focus is investigative, providing multiple perspectives on the crime and its aftermath without pushing modern ideological narratives.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

15%

18%

20%

Movie poster for Cops Who Kill With Will Mellor

Movie poster for Mud, Sweat and Tears: Premiership Rugby

Movie poster for Fred and Rose West: A British Horror Story

Movie poster for Ferrari: Race to Immortality

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.