Whose Vote Counts, Explained (2020) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

90%

Whose Vote Counts, Explained2020

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

'Whose Vote Counts, Explained' is a textbook example of modern media prioritizing ideological messaging and progressive activism over balanced inquiry. Expect little in the way of pluralism or respect for non-woke perspectives.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The series centers heavily on modern political issues, placing strong focus on identity and structural inequities. Some viewers may feel that the storytelling prioritizes ideological messaging over balanced discussion, with real-world complexities taking a back seat to activism-driven narratives.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Traditional views around citizenship, national identity, and democratic norms are depicted in a skeptical, revisionist light, often framing longstanding American values as problematic rather than nuanced. Alternative perspectives on democratic participation get little airtime.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The show rarely strays from progressive, activist-driven interpretations of voter issues. Dissenting or traditional viewpoints, when presented, tend to be portrayed as obstacles or outdated, signaling a near-total embrace of a single worldview.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

80%

90%

Movie poster for Headspace Guide to Sleep

85%

Movie poster for Land of the Giants: Titans of Tech

88%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.