Yeralash (1974) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

10%

Yeralash1974

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Yeralash remains a product of its time, almost untouched by modern ideological trends. Its light, apolitical humor and adherence to conventional family and social themes earn it a very low “woke” score.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

“Yeralash” is a classic Soviet-era children's comedy series presenting short, humorous sketches. The focus remains on everyday childhood situations rather than pushing identity politics or modern ideological messaging. There’s minimal evidence of characters being chosen or written with any modern identity emphasis.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The show depicts children and adults in a generally traditional manner, upholding family and social structures common to its time. Masculinity, femininity, and cultural norms are treated in a straightforward, often lighthearted way, without obvious attempts to undermine such values.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

While the show does not parody dissenting social perspectives, it reflects the era’s approach, centering on Soviet values rather than today’s ideological frameworks. It doesn’t mock traditional roles, though there’s little debate or ideological plurality (typical for the context).

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for A Dog Was Walking on the Piano

Movie poster for The New Adventures of Captain Vrungel

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.