Yonderland (2013) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

12%

Yonderland2013

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Yonderland is a refreshingly non-woke, romp through fantasy tropes, more interested in making you laugh than ticking boxes. No ideological lectures here, just good, old-fashioned British silliness.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Yonderland plays things for laughs, with character casting and writing clearly dictated by comedic needs rather than ideological checkboxes. There is little sense that identity politics override storytelling, and the sense of fun remains the priority. No signs of forced representation or overpowered newcomers here.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Family life and traditional morality are gently lampooned but not seriously undermined. The show’s satire targets everyone equally, without a particular agenda against religion, masculinity, or family. In fact, it ultimately celebrates ordinary parenthood and community in its own silly way.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There’s a clear diversity of thought and parody, no shortage of buffoonery across archetypes and professions. Traditional viewpoints aren’t villainized, nor is any particular ideology lifted above others. The humor often relies on the clash of old and new rather than monolithic progressive ideals.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Doctor Who: Meanwhile in the TARDIS: Part 2

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.