Amos & Andrew (1993) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

59%

Amos & Andrew1993

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Amos & Andrew doesn’t quite hit modern Hollywood levels of wokeness, but it does put identity and social critique at the forefront, sometimes at the expense of natural storytelling and cultural nuance. It lands solidly in the moderately woke camp.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

The film clearly centers race and social commentary in its premise, with character identities driving much of the conflict. While not as overtly agenda-driven as recent films, Amos & Andrew does lean heavily on racial misunderstandings for plot development. This emphasis sometimes overshadows natural character growth or narrative nuance.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

Themes subtly critique rural Southern culture, policing, and media sensationalism, often casting traditional authority figures in a negative light. While overt attacks on family or religion are limited, there’s a definite skepticism toward traditional power structures woven throughout.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Woke

What is this?

The film primarily presents bigotry and misunderstanding as blunt flaws in the white characters, with little sincere exploration of alternative perspectives. Dissenting views are generally caricatured or lampooned, so genuine pluralism takes a back seat to moral messaging.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

25%

13%

Movie poster for The Long Kiss Goodnight

27%

10%

12%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.