Assault on Precinct 13 (2005) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

12%

Assault on Precinct 132005

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Assault on Precinct 13 (2005) is practically an endangered species: an action-thriller with little sign of modern woke trends. Gritty, straightforward, and focused on the story, it’s a welcome reprieve from Hollywood’s usual hand-waving lectures.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Assault on Precinct 13 (2005) focuses on tense action and traditional character archetypes rather than box-checking for diversity or identity-driven messaging. Casting, character flaws, and plot progression feel more in service of the story than ideology. Frankly, it's refreshingly straightforward by modern standards.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The film depicts authority, masculinity, and moral ambiguity without derision for traditional roles. Family, faith, or cultural traditions aren’t mocked or rewritten; if anything, the gritty realism honors some classic action sensibilities. Nothing here feels like a modern revisionist lecture.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

This movie doesn’t go out of its way to mock alternative worldviews or paint dissenting voices as cartoon villains. Characters clash out of necessity, not ideology. Diversity of motive and opinion drives the plot, not a single set of modern moral virtues.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

17%

12%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.