Casino Royale (2006) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

12%

Casino Royale2006

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Casino Royale is refreshingly non-woke, focusing on character, plot, and classic Bond themes. It avoids most of the modern Hollywood “woke” trappings, making it a standout for those who value narrative integrity and timeless storytelling.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Casino Royale stays true to its narrative roots, focusing on Bond's skills, flaws, and development. There's little emphasis on identity politics or forced representation. The casting centers on fit and character rather than agendas, and diverse characters are given meaningful arcs rather than being elevated without reason.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The film presents traditional masculinity in a nuanced way, Bond's toughness is challenged, but not mocked, and classic themes of love, betrayal, and duty are maintained. Religion and family aren't major topics, and there's no overt subversion of traditional culture.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There’s very little ideological messaging. The film doesn’t villainize traditional views or push a specific agenda. Bond faces moral dilemmas, and multiple perspectives are explored through character conflict, making room for pluralism in the narrative.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

10%

Movie poster for The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug

12%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.