No Time to Die (2021) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

86%

No Time to Die2021

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

No Time to Die shifts the Bond formula to suit contemporary ideological preferences, foregrounding diversity and modern gender politics at the expense of what made Bond iconic. Classic fans may find the film’s overall approach a bit too eager to impress the woke crowd.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

No Time to Die features notable identity-based casting and narrative choices, such as passing the 007 mantle to a female character and sidelining James Bond himself. In our view, these elements seem designed to address diversity checkboxes and ideological trends, occasionally at the expense of the classic Bond persona and story tension.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Traditional masculinity is openly critiqued or reconfigured, with Bond portrayed as vulnerable, emotionally driven, and ultimately replaced by a female agent. Family, romance, and legacy are filtered through a modern lens, which could be seen as undermining the classic Bond archetype’s aura of strength and tradition.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Dissenting or traditional perspectives are mostly absent. The new cast and narrative direction reflect a homogeneous embrace of modern ideological values, with little evidence of serious internal debate or alternative viewpoints. Traditional Bond traits are either critiqued or quietly retired.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

10%

10%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.