Cradle Will Rock (1999) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

62%

Cradle Will Rock1999

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Cradle Will Rock pushes a vintage progressive message, focusing on underdog artists versus the establishment. It’s not ‘woke’ by today’s standards but still displays a left-leaning bias, mainly in how it sees authority and dissent, not box-checking or modern identity politics.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

Cradle Will Rock has a clear political bent, but it largely avoids the modern 'checklist' of diverse representation for its own sake. Characters are still rooted in their historical context. Any ideological aspects serve the larger plot about 1930s labor and the arts, not identity boxes.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

The film doesn’t aggressively undermine traditional culture, but it does present institutions like religion, capitalism, and government as obstacles to progress or individual expression. While not the full woke rewrite, it wears its 1990s left-leaning slant obviously.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Woke

What is this?

Alternative worldviews (such as pro-business or traditional establishment positions) are mostly villainized or caricatured. The sympathetic characters are predominantly those who question authority, with little space for genuine debate or meaningful pluralism.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

12%

12%

Movie poster for When a Man Loves a Woman

12%

20%

Movie poster for What's Love Got to Do with It

16%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.