The film focuses almost entirely on character-driven storytelling, particularly the flawed relationship between a boy and his father. It avoids obvious token casting or ideological intrusions. Characters are developed based on personality and experience rather than identity. No sense of forced representation or characters being made flawless for the sake of modern values.

While masculinity and family are put under a harsh spotlight, particularly through a dysfunctional father-son relationship, the film doesn’t overtly moralize or paint tradition as inherently bad. It’s more about personal trauma than attacking larger cultural foundations, but there is a sense that traditional fatherhood is shown mostly through its failings.

The film’s worldview is mainly psychological and personal. There's little sign of overt ideological uniformity or an attempt to villainize dissent. Multiple perspectives are presented, focusing on individual struggle rather than preaching a single modern moral vision.