Hope Springs (2012) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

12%

Hope Springs2012

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Hope Springs is refreshingly low on wokeness, focusing on authentic relationship struggles without ideological lecturing. It honors tradition while exploring real-world issues couples face.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Hope Springs keeps its focus on the natural growth of its central couple. Character backgrounds and struggles are grounded and relatable, not warped by forced representation or ideological priorities. The storytelling prioritizes sincerity over box-ticking diversity or treating core identity markers as plot points.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The film takes a fairly traditional look at marriage, faithfulness, and long-term relationships. Any challenges to cultural norms are more about personal healing than attacking traditional values. Masculinity and femininity are not mocked, and the institution of marriage is treated sincerely, even lovingly.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Dissenting viewpoints are treated with respect, and the film acknowledges different perspectives on marriage therapy, intimacy, and generational change without painting anyone as the villain. There's no monolithic outlook forced on viewers, facilitating real conversation.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

12%

15%

Movie poster for Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story

20%

Movie poster for Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.