I Want to Eat Your Pancreas (2018) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

I Want to Eat Your Pancreas2018

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

“I Want to Eat Your Pancreas” is refreshingly non-woke, prioritizing heartfelt storytelling over ideological messaging. A rare example of modern animation that isn’t interested in checking diversity boxes or rewriting traditional values.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The film places character and emotional development front and center, focusing on universal themes of friendship, mortality, and personal growth. There’s no noticeable emphasis on identity politics, forced representation, or characters defined primarily by their race, gender, or sexuality.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Traditional values like family, friendship, and the importance of emotional connection are integral. Masculinity and femininity are handled in a traditional, non-subversive manner, and there’s no attempt to revise cultural or historical elements to fit modern ideological frameworks.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

The film steers clear of overt ideology, focusing instead on human experience and the complexities of interpersonal relationships. No agenda, caricatured traditionalists, or forced moral lessons here, just genuine character conflict and growth.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

15%

60%

75%

Movie poster for Mission: Yozakura Family

Movie poster for Fate/stay night: Heaven's Feel III. Spring Song

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.