Little Fish (2005) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Little Fish2005

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Little Fish steers clear of heavy-handed woke intrusions. It's a gritty, character-centric drama where identity politics don't get top billing, and complex human stories remain at the forefront. A rare example of recent cinema that doesn't try to teach you a social studies lesson at every turn.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Little Fish (2005) focuses on character-driven storytelling, centered on personal struggles, addiction, and redemption in suburban Australia. There is little evidence of characters being cast or written primarily for identity reasons, nor is there an overemphasis on ideology at the expense of plot or realism.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The film portrays complex family relationships and struggles with addiction without overtly undermining traditional cultural or moral values. Masculinity, family, and community appear nuanced rather than satirized or vilified, making the approach feel more grounded than agenda-driven.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Alternative perspectives, especially regarding crime and recovery, are depicted with some nuance. While modern moral themes exist, the film does not aggressively mock dissent or enforce a singular ideological viewpoint throughout its narrative.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

12%

15%

13%

Movie poster for H2O: Just Add Water: Metamorphosis

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.