Smoke (1995) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Smoke1995

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

‘Smoke’ is a breath of non-woke fresh air, character-led, respectful of tradition, and impressively free from heavy-handed messaging or identity-driven storytelling. It’s what classic filmmaking looks like before Hollywood caught the woke wave.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

‘Smoke’ is refreshingly focused on character depth, human connection, and narrative realism. Identities like race or gender are present but not forced or used as ideological banners. The plot revolves around authentic personal struggles, without modern-style box-ticking or identity-first casting.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

This film is rooted in everyday life and quietly traditional values: friendship, redemption, and the search for meaning. There’s no overt subversion of cultural foundations, nor does it mock traditional roles or institutions. Masculinity, for example, is portrayed with nuance, not as a punchline.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

‘Smoke’ features diverse worldviews and respects complexity in belief and motivation. Characters are flawed and genuine, and there’s no dogmatic narrative demanding moral conformity. It offers nuance over caricature, steering clear of the ideological echo chamber common in recent films.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Things to Do in Denver When You're Dead

52%

13%

15%

12%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.