The China Syndrome (1979) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

18%

The China Syndrome1979

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

The China Syndrome is an old-school thriller that barely registers on the woke meter. While it questions authority, it does so through classic storytelling, not modern ideological filters. Very light on the woke content by today’s standards.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The China Syndrome is a tense, well-constructed thriller that focuses on issues around nuclear safety and media ethics, not box-ticking identity politics. Characters are written for their roles in the narrative, not to fulfill quota requirements. The story foregrounds suspense and realism over ideology.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

While the film does question authority and corporate motives, it doesn’t aggressively attack traditional cultural foundations like family, religion, or masculinity. The protagonist is a strong female journalist, but this is handled in a grounded, era-appropriate way, not with modern overtones of subversion.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Mildly Woke

What is this?

The film has a clear critique of corporate and governmental malfeasance, but this theme was common in '70s cinema and doesn’t overtly demonize all alternative views. The focus is more on whistleblowing and the dangers of unchecked power than on enforcing a rigid ideological worldview.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

20%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.