The Death and Life of Bobby Z (2007) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

The Death and Life of Bobby Z2007

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

The Death and Life of Bobby Z is refreshingly non-woke, sticking to well-worn crime-action beats without inserting identity politics or forced modern ideology. It’s an old-school genre piece that won’t set off any ideological alarms.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

This film mostly focuses on an action-driven plot with little evidence of identity-based casting or prioritizing ideology over story. Characters are developed through their actions rather than through an agenda-oriented lens. There’s little forced representation or flawless diverse characters; storytelling gets priority.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The movie doesn't seem to make deliberate efforts to undermine family, religion, masculinity, or tradition. Traditional masculine traits are central to the protagonist's journey, and there's little subversion of gender roles. It largely sticks to genre tropes rather than delivering any ideological message.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There’s no notable mocking or absence of alternative worldviews. The film doesn’t go out of its way to demonize traditional perspectives or promote a single ideology. It remains focused on its crime-action narrative, not pushing any specific ideological monoculture.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Undisputed II: Last Man Standing

15%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.