The Exorcism of Emily Rose (2005) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

The Exorcism of Emily Rose2005

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

'The Exorcism of Emily Rose' stands out in modern Hollywood as practically non-woke, respecting faith, tradition, and plural viewpoints. Identity politics take a back seat to a genuinely intriguing debate about good, evil, and belief.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The film's narrative is driven by a classic courtroom drama framework with a supernatural twist. Character development is rooted in believable motivations rather than identity checkboxes. Diverse casting or identity-based appeals don't overshadow the story, keeping the focus on faith, doubt, and morality.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Religion is actually taken seriously here, with the Catholic Church and traditional faith shown as complex and sincere. Rather than mocking faith or family, the film explores their value and moral weight, even engaging in debate about science versus faith without dismissing either.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There's a real effort to present both religious and secular perspectives sincerely. No side is purely demonized, and the audience is left to wrestle with the ambiguity. Alternative worldviews are given thoughtful dialogue, with no cartoonish straw men in sight.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

12%

13%

Movie poster for Underworld: Rise of the Lycans

22%

15%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.